All this Sartrean "oh, woe, I'm rendered in-itself" - surely without human interaction we wouldn't actually have developed into thinking things in the first place - or am I completely overestimating the link between thought and language? Is there something inherent about the language of thought? Was Descartes right and the "I think" can be completely isolated, a fact on its own without any necessary inferences? (Does it have to be holistic to say that's bullcrap?)
Or is all this just a quirk of human biology? Is it that we need to be raised in this "society" concept as a first stage - an unfortunate but necessary developmental process - just in order for our adult selves to be able to make the choice to shun it and strip away the very thing that brought us to the decision in the first place? How futile.
So at what point does human interaction suddenly switch over from developing our thought to rendering us passive?
